"Monogamist" Cult Finds A Politically Correct Way To Deny Their Own

There are tens of thousands of [Cult] children that are suffering from chronic malnutrition—leading to lifelong cognitive and physical defects, and in some cases contributing to their death. ... “We estimate 80,000 active [Cult] children suffer from chronic malnutrition, and about 900 die from malnutrition each year.” While these findings may appear inconceivable to many [followers] throughout first world countries, the everyday reality of the acute needs among children in less developed countries is known by those who live with it every day

People want to know ..., why aren’t tithing and fast offerings taking care of it.

Elder Joseph B. Wirthlin said, “At this very hour on this very day, some members even in our [Cult] are praying for the miracle that would allow them to surmount the suffering that surrounds them. If, while we have the means to do so, we do not have compassion for them and spring to their aid, we are in danger of being among those the prophet Moroni spoke of when he said, ‘Behold, ye do love money, and your substance, and your fine apparel…more than ye love the poor and the needy, the sick and the afflicted.”

To read more:
http://themormonworker.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/for-i-was-hungry-and-you-gave-me-food/

It seems that in spite of the "Monogamist" Cult's stand, there are a few "monogamist" followers that have tried to come up with a temporary solution, perhaps in an attempt to make believe that "monogamists" are not all bad.

Perhaps they are not all bad. But, hey, lets not get carried away.

If This Story Doesn't Turn Everyone Against "Monogamy", Nothing Will

All too often I find stories that just cannot be written about, or more accurately, I cannot find the words to write my disgust sufficiently. What can a person say about a cult that breeds this kind of evil?

A "monogamist" couple sending pornography back and forth over the internet, including a video of the mother committing sexual acts with her 10 month old son. It begs the question, what do they do to the children in private????

To read the story, including a copy of the Indictment, here's the address:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/09/ashley-jessup-rape-son-10-month-old-baby_n_956125.html

"Monogamy" and Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children

There is so much discussion in the Media about the exploitation of children in "monogamous" society, that it is overlooked. It seems that "monogamous" society has become accustomed to its own ills. Hypocritically, "monogamous" society seems to strive so hard to focus in on anything that may be considered abuse by polygamous society. But the question is why? Why do they put so much effort into striving to find abuse in other societies? Obviously it is the same answer as it has always been. Abusers always try to find fault in every other arena to make themselves feel justified in their own sick and perverse behaviours. And if they cannot find suitable fault, they attack the innocent by slander and propaganda.

Why are "monogamous" children sexually exploited?

There are a number of predisposing factors related to "Monogamous" society, "monogamous" families, and "monogamous" individuals that contribute to children of "monogamous" heritage being forced and/or recruited into the sex trade.

Some of the predisposing factors of the sexual exploitation of children in "monogamous" society are:

• Gender inequality instigated poverty
• High youth unemployment
• Racism and discrimination aimed at aboriginal and minority youth
• Economic and social stigmatizms
• Consumerism
• Organized crime and gang networks
• Media bias

Some of the "monogamous" family factors are:

• Intergenerational domestic violence
• drug and alcohol abuse
• sexual, emotional, and physical abuse
• Co-dependency
• Inadequate "monogamous" parenting techniques
• Insufficient supervision, affection, and attention
• Single-parent "monogamous" families

Some of the predisposing factors associated with "monogamous" individuals are:

• Early life traumas caused by emotional, sexual, or physical abuse, or by neglect and deprivation.
• Homelessness as a result of running away, or having to raise themselves, often resulting in a kennel type mentality
• Learning disabilities and neurological disorders
• Lack of education
• Being outcast because of sexual identity and labeling

It is not difficult to see the reality of "monogamy". Children subjected to this perverse "monogamous" society are at an extremely high risk to be drawn into sexual trafficking. The reality of living in such abusive situations, emotionally isolated from appropriate parental love, unyielding poverty, unemployment and homelessness, often coupled with substance abuse leaves many children of "monogamy" open to sexual exploitation.

A Story About Lies, Deception, Defrauding Welfare, Child Sex and Child Pregnancies

Try as I may, I can never explain the true psychological, physiological, and ever-lasting damages of the perverse "monogamous" culture. Once again in the "monogamous" cult there is a story of child sex and children having children. It is so disgusting, but still the "monogamous" media writers try to portray the sex scandal as a simple childhood malady, when the truth is so very clear. Here there are two sets of parents, claiming autonomy, in other words negligent parents, refusing to give the proper love and supervision to their children.

And yet, after claiming that they knew nothing of the situation, the parents are going to come out ahead. Now they have a new child in the house and their daughter is a single teen mother, eligible for all sorts of monetary government benefits. What an easy way for dead-beat parents to defraud the welfare system and get a larger income, but to pimp out their daughter. But who can they pimp out their daughter too? It takes a great deal of planning and forethought to pull off a scam of this calibre. They have to choose a boy old enough to produce sperm, but young enough to be easily controlled and not put up too much of a fight. Not to mention the delicate interaction that will be needed with the boy's parents. So who better than an 11 year old boy with a single mother, who feels a high level of shame?? Or perhaps both sets of parents have an understanding? What right does the 11 year old boy have to his unborn child? He is just a pawn in the satanic rituals of the carnal followers of "monogamy".

If this is how the children of "monogamy" are being used and treated, what kind of home life can we expect for the now unborn child? Are we to expect that the child will have any love or happiness in its life? Any freedom, or choice for the direction of its own life? Or more likely, can we expect that the child will be shamelessly inducted into the carnal lifestyle of "monogamists", to be used to gain money, or to fulfill the sick and perverted lusts of its predecessors?

The story can be found here at:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/father-11-hides-as-pregnant-girl-faces-the-media-1246186.html

More Brain Washing From The Canadian Courts

I had thought that perhaps I was being too cynical in my approach toward "Monogamy", and that is why I had set this blog to private, and had taken a break from revealing the truth about government forced "Monogamous" only marriages, but with the recent decision announced by the BC Courts, I once again feel the need to publish my story and reveal the truth about "Monogamy".

"Polygamy has no place in modern society. ... In our view, polygamy is harmful to society, to those involved with it, particularly to women and to children born within polygamous families," Nicholson said in a House of Commons.

The entire reason that I left "Monogamous" society, was to leave behind the abuse and harms that were found there. I found the Polygamous relationships to be far more kind and considerate than any that I have ever seen among the "monogamous". I will never return to the violent and abusive "momogamous" society.

To read more on the Courts decision:
http://news.sympatico.ca/canada/provincial_court_upholds_ban_on_polygamy/fee012c8

Charged With Sex Assault, An Award Winning Monogamist.

"The married father of three, who's from Surrey, B.C., must abstain from any contact with his victim..."

It almost seems too incredulous. A "monogamist" must stay away from his victim? How could this be? How could it be a "monogamist" that commits crimes of sex abuse? After all, doesn't the media espouse that only polygamous unions are evil? Maybe they got their facts wrong, and perhaps they meant to say that the polygamous father of three is charged with five counts of sex assault?

And to make matters worse, the victim was under the age of consent. Well, the media has been very conscientious about teaching us that only polygamists would do such a thing, that "monogamists" wait until the child reaches the age of consent before they involve them in sexual exploits.

Why is it that polygamy is on trial again?

Read more: http://news.ca.msn.com/canada/cp-article.aspx?cp-documentid=27307441

Same Sex Marriage Laws

The Saskatchewan government has decided to tell its marriage commissioners that they must perform same-sex marriages if requested.

Hopefully Saskatchewan will soon fully recognize polygamous unions as well.

Read More: http://news.ca.msn.com/local/saskatchewan/article.aspx?cp-documentid=27298669

Update

I have taken a short break from blogging and have decided to spend most of the winter concentrating on writing, and playing snowball games with my family.

It is so amazing to have the freedom to play outdoors and not have to worry that the "monogamists" will spot our children and cause all sorts of havoc. An interesting article was written in the Columbia Daily Tribune [http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/jan/13/police-arrest-woman-walking-kids-in-snow/] about a woman who was arrested for walking her children in the winter. Now, surely more of the story will come out as the case proceeds, but in light of what has been reported, this is insane. I certainly hope those police constables never come to Canada. They would have to arrest the populace of the entire country.

It was reported that the woman "...told officers she left the children’s grandmother’s residence on Sanford because she felt uncomfortable." Was she afraid for the children's sake? Did she leave because of abuse? Could the police have escorted her and her children to a shelter, instead of a jail cell? Clearly the article did very little to address the story. Instead it was written with an obvious bias to gain public sympathy in favour of the children being reprimanded into custody for early "monogamist" grooming. Hopefully, more of the story will come out, if a reporter that is interested in the truth can be found.

National Knife Ban

National Knife Ban
NEWSFLASH


CANADIAN COURT BANS KNIVES THROUGHOUT CANADA

Vancouver Clarion (www.vancouverclarion.ca)
by staff reporter Fartu Sharpe, Tuesday, January 11, 2011

In a stunning announcement in Ottawa today, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its ruling in the long-running legal controversy over the criminalization of knives. Several Canadian provinces have had prohibitions against knives dating back two centuries (since thousands of innocent Canadian settlers were massacred by knife-wielding savages). These laws have generally been seldom enforced, thus allowing millions to prepare meals and perform important medical procedures.

In its 4-to-3 decision the Court upheld British Columbia's ban on knives and ordered all Canadian subjects to bring all of their knives to local government collection centers within 10 days, or face a $10,000.00 penalty and a five-year prison term.

Chief Justice Hadabad Papercut, writing for the majority, reasoned,

" . . . if it can be shown [and it has been amply demonstrated] that knives are sharp and can kill people, then it is the opinion of this Court that they represent too great a danger to life as we know it. Thousands of innocent Canadians have died or been permanently disfigured by knives. Knives are inherently evil. Knives have almost assumed a life of their own. It is not beyond the realm of logic to conclude that some knives lie awake at night plotting to maim or kill their next victim. We celebrate this opportunity to bring justice to our great land and we now encourage the RCMP to arrest knives and anyone possessing them whenever they are discovered."

In a vehement reaction to the ruling, lawyers for the Canadian Civil Liberties Union protested that knives are no more guilty of harming people than automobiles. Speaking on behalf or the CCLU, chief litigator, Eli O'Reilly, complained,

"How are people going to be able to cook? How will people be able to cut their food? It seems to me that the size of government will have to grow exponentially just to provide sufficient police officers to watch every Canadian. Surely it is not realistic to hunt down every knife in the country? I can see the provinces stationing a Mountie in every home just to watch people to see if they own or use a knife. It is PEOPLE who do bad things - NOT inanimate objects like knives and broccoli. Where will it stop? Pretty soon, they will outlaw automobiles, because far more people have been killed or injured by cars than by knives. Plus, cars can be downright mean when they want to be!"

Canadian teen singing sensation, Justin Bieber (shown above in a threatening pose), who was recently outed as being a knife-lover, was visibly shaken when he heard the news at his California home today. Bieber expressed fear that what he perceived to be an "insane" ruling from the Canadian Court would gain traction in the States, where the Obama/Bernanke administration already plans to take away people's guns and home-grown vegetables.

I borrowed this post from the Fall of Reynolds. It fits so well with the BC trial.
http://fallofreynolds.blogspot.com/2011/01/national-knife-ban.html