"The married father of three, who's from Surrey, B.C., must abstain from any contact with his victim..."
It almost seems too incredulous. A "monogamist" must stay away from his victim? How could this be? How could it be a "monogamist" that commits crimes of sex abuse? After all, doesn't the media espouse that only polygamous unions are evil? Maybe they got their facts wrong, and perhaps they meant to say that the polygamous father of three is charged with five counts of sex assault?
And to make matters worse, the victim was under the age of consent. Well, the media has been very conscientious about teaching us that only polygamists would do such a thing, that "monogamists" wait until the child reaches the age of consent before they involve them in sexual exploits.
Why is it that polygamy is on trial again?
Read more: http://news.ca.msn.com/canada/cp-article.aspx?cp-documentid=27307441
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment