"The married father of three, who's from Surrey, B.C., must abstain from any contact with his victim..."
It almost seems too incredulous. A "monogamist" must stay away from his victim? How could this be? How could it be a "monogamist" that commits crimes of sex abuse? After all, doesn't the media espouse that only polygamous unions are evil? Maybe they got their facts wrong, and perhaps they meant to say that the polygamous father of three is charged with five counts of sex assault?
And to make matters worse, the victim was under the age of consent. Well, the media has been very conscientious about teaching us that only polygamists would do such a thing, that "monogamists" wait until the child reaches the age of consent before they involve them in sexual exploits.
Why is it that polygamy is on trial again?
Read more: http://news.ca.msn.com/canada/cp-article.aspx?cp-documentid=27307441
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Same Sex Marriage Laws
The Saskatchewan government has decided to tell its marriage commissioners that they must perform same-sex marriages if requested.
Hopefully Saskatchewan will soon fully recognize polygamous unions as well.
Read More: http://news.ca.msn.com/local/saskatchewan/article.aspx?cp-documentid=27298669
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Update
I have taken a short break from blogging and have decided to spend most of the winter concentrating on writing, and playing snowball games with my family.
It is so amazing to have the freedom to play outdoors and not have to worry that the "monogamists" will spot our children and cause all sorts of havoc. An interesting article was written in the Columbia Daily Tribune [http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/jan/13/police-arrest-woman-walking-kids-in-snow/] about a woman who was arrested for walking her children in the winter. Now, surely more of the story will come out as the case proceeds, but in light of what has been reported, this is insane. I certainly hope those police constables never come to Canada. They would have to arrest the populace of the entire country.
It was reported that the woman "...told officers she left the children’s grandmother’s residence on Sanford because she felt uncomfortable." Was she afraid for the children's sake? Did she leave because of abuse? Could the police have escorted her and her children to a shelter, instead of a jail cell? Clearly the article did very little to address the story. Instead it was written with an obvious bias to gain public sympathy in favour of the children being reprimanded into custody for early "monogamist" grooming. Hopefully, more of the story will come out, if a reporter that is interested in the truth can be found.
It is so amazing to have the freedom to play outdoors and not have to worry that the "monogamists" will spot our children and cause all sorts of havoc. An interesting article was written in the Columbia Daily Tribune [http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2011/jan/13/police-arrest-woman-walking-kids-in-snow/] about a woman who was arrested for walking her children in the winter. Now, surely more of the story will come out as the case proceeds, but in light of what has been reported, this is insane. I certainly hope those police constables never come to Canada. They would have to arrest the populace of the entire country.
It was reported that the woman "...told officers she left the children’s grandmother’s residence on Sanford because she felt uncomfortable." Was she afraid for the children's sake? Did she leave because of abuse? Could the police have escorted her and her children to a shelter, instead of a jail cell? Clearly the article did very little to address the story. Instead it was written with an obvious bias to gain public sympathy in favour of the children being reprimanded into custody for early "monogamist" grooming. Hopefully, more of the story will come out, if a reporter that is interested in the truth can be found.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
National Knife Ban
National Knife Ban
NEWSFLASH
CANADIAN COURT BANS KNIVES THROUGHOUT CANADA
Vancouver Clarion (www.vancouverclarion.ca)
by staff reporter Fartu Sharpe, Tuesday, January 11, 2011
In a stunning announcement in Ottawa today, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its ruling in the long-running legal controversy over the criminalization of knives. Several Canadian provinces have had prohibitions against knives dating back two centuries (since thousands of innocent Canadian settlers were massacred by knife-wielding savages). These laws have generally been seldom enforced, thus allowing millions to prepare meals and perform important medical procedures.
In its 4-to-3 decision the Court upheld British Columbia's ban on knives and ordered all Canadian subjects to bring all of their knives to local government collection centers within 10 days, or face a $10,000.00 penalty and a five-year prison term.
Chief Justice Hadabad Papercut, writing for the majority, reasoned,
" . . . if it can be shown [and it has been amply demonstrated] that knives are sharp and can kill people, then it is the opinion of this Court that they represent too great a danger to life as we know it. Thousands of innocent Canadians have died or been permanently disfigured by knives. Knives are inherently evil. Knives have almost assumed a life of their own. It is not beyond the realm of logic to conclude that some knives lie awake at night plotting to maim or kill their next victim. We celebrate this opportunity to bring justice to our great land and we now encourage the RCMP to arrest knives and anyone possessing them whenever they are discovered."
In a vehement reaction to the ruling, lawyers for the Canadian Civil Liberties Union protested that knives are no more guilty of harming people than automobiles. Speaking on behalf or the CCLU, chief litigator, Eli O'Reilly, complained,
"How are people going to be able to cook? How will people be able to cut their food? It seems to me that the size of government will have to grow exponentially just to provide sufficient police officers to watch every Canadian. Surely it is not realistic to hunt down every knife in the country? I can see the provinces stationing a Mountie in every home just to watch people to see if they own or use a knife. It is PEOPLE who do bad things - NOT inanimate objects like knives and broccoli. Where will it stop? Pretty soon, they will outlaw automobiles, because far more people have been killed or injured by cars than by knives. Plus, cars can be downright mean when they want to be!"
Canadian teen singing sensation, Justin Bieber (shown above in a threatening pose), who was recently outed as being a knife-lover, was visibly shaken when he heard the news at his California home today. Bieber expressed fear that what he perceived to be an "insane" ruling from the Canadian Court would gain traction in the States, where the Obama/Bernanke administration already plans to take away people's guns and home-grown vegetables.
I borrowed this post from the Fall of Reynolds. It fits so well with the BC trial.
http://fallofreynolds.blogspot.com/2011/01/national-knife-ban.html
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Holiday Season
Just a quick update!
As my readers can see, I have been no longer limiting my posts to just my family, but also included topics in the news, especially since the court case in BC has begun. There are way too many victims of "monogamy" to just keep silent.
After the Holiday Season, I will get back to blogging.
But, to tide everyone over, here's an interesting idea from NCBI/PubMed.gov/U.S. National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12027028)
Here are some ideas from Stephen J. Dubner
He references a working paper the AAWE has just posted: “Women or Wine? Monogamy and Alcohol,” by Mara Squicciarini and Jo Swinnen.
It is an interesting article. If you would like to read it in full, check out http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/27/do-we-drink-because-were-monogamous-or-are-we-monogamous-because-we-drink/
The ironic part is that there are some very serious and evidential psychological associations between abuse and alcoholism. It does not take a psychologist to see the connection between alcohol use/misuse to run away from conscience and accountability. Alcohol has long been used to dampen the conscience and lower inhibitions for the express purpose of obtaining goals which society and Jimminy Cricket would not approve. In fact, this is the only reason that people drink; to stop the negative/controlling feelings, and allow us to have what we could not bring ourselves to have otherwise.
When I return from my short hiatus, I will attempt to address some of these proven and documented associations, most especially how it applies to the self-righteous, mind controlling, abusive cult of "monogamy".
As my readers can see, I have been no longer limiting my posts to just my family, but also included topics in the news, especially since the court case in BC has begun. There are way too many victims of "monogamy" to just keep silent.
After the Holiday Season, I will get back to blogging.
But, to tide everyone over, here's an interesting idea from NCBI/PubMed.gov/U.S. National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12027028)
Alcohol use and serial monogamy as risks for sexually transmitted diseases in young adults.
Corbin WR, Fromme K.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 78712, USA.
Abstract
Alcohol and condom use were assessed using global, situational, and event-level analyses in a sample of young adults (N = 305). Results varied by methodology, event, and partner type; an inverse association between alcohol and condom use was found only at the event level. Participants with strong sex-related expectancies used condoms less frequently when drinking at the time of 1st intercourse with their current partner. For most recent event with a regular partner, alcohol use was unrelated to condom use, but gender, relationship duration, and oral contraceptive use accounted for more than 25% of the variance. Thus, alcohol may increase risky sex early in a relationship, whereas partner familiarity and alternate contraceptive use play a larger role as relationships develop.
Here are some ideas from Stephen J. Dubner
Do We Drink Because We’re Monogamous, or Are We Monogamous Because We Drink?
He references a working paper the AAWE has just posted: “Women or Wine? Monogamy and Alcohol,” by Mara Squicciarini and Jo Swinnen.
Historically, we find a correlation between the shift from polygyny to monogamy and the growth of alcohol consumption. Cross-culturally we also find that monogamous societies consume more alcohol than polygynous societies in the preindustrial world.
It is an interesting article. If you would like to read it in full, check out http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/27/do-we-drink-because-were-monogamous-or-are-we-monogamous-because-we-drink/
The ironic part is that there are some very serious and evidential psychological associations between abuse and alcoholism. It does not take a psychologist to see the connection between alcohol use/misuse to run away from conscience and accountability. Alcohol has long been used to dampen the conscience and lower inhibitions for the express purpose of obtaining goals which society and Jimminy Cricket would not approve. In fact, this is the only reason that people drink; to stop the negative/controlling feelings, and allow us to have what we could not bring ourselves to have otherwise.
When I return from my short hiatus, I will attempt to address some of these proven and documented associations, most especially how it applies to the self-righteous, mind controlling, abusive cult of "monogamy".
Sunday, December 26, 2010
The Virtues Of "Monogamy"
Here's a cartoon depicting the "virtues" of "monogamy".
http://www.thedocisin.net/?p=844
http://www.thedocisin.net/?p=844
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Family Update
Well, I thought I would leave behind the political agenda today and update everyone on what is happening in our family.
First, Mary-Beth is doing better, but still goes through very deep and serious bouts of depression. She can be happy one moment, then instantly go very sullen. We have her over here often to give her a break from her abusive husband. Lorne has seemed to come to terms with our 'talk' and he is healing well. Mary-Beth tells me that Lorne has relaxed a lot of his abuse, and that she is able to tolerate the rest for the time being. My little niece is doing okay, and loves to play with her cousins.
Our children are doing well and growing fast. They are enjoying the winter snow. They love to make snowmen, go skiing and snowshoeing, and especially make snow cones. We just have to make certain that they have the snow cones early enough in the day, because that much sugar really gets them going.
Toni loves her job at the vet clinic, but is sad that she misses out on a lot of the winter fun with the children.
Our extended families have been leaving us alone for the most part lately. It is nice not to have to live with the constant threats they make against the children. There is so much peace in our lives, now that we have escaped from our "monogamist" past. The children no longer have to live with abuse and they are doing well in their studies. It is so amazing, they are happy and healthy now that they are far away from the brainwashing and abuse.
First, Mary-Beth is doing better, but still goes through very deep and serious bouts of depression. She can be happy one moment, then instantly go very sullen. We have her over here often to give her a break from her abusive husband. Lorne has seemed to come to terms with our 'talk' and he is healing well. Mary-Beth tells me that Lorne has relaxed a lot of his abuse, and that she is able to tolerate the rest for the time being. My little niece is doing okay, and loves to play with her cousins.
Our children are doing well and growing fast. They are enjoying the winter snow. They love to make snowmen, go skiing and snowshoeing, and especially make snow cones. We just have to make certain that they have the snow cones early enough in the day, because that much sugar really gets them going.
Toni loves her job at the vet clinic, but is sad that she misses out on a lot of the winter fun with the children.
Our extended families have been leaving us alone for the most part lately. It is nice not to have to live with the constant threats they make against the children. There is so much peace in our lives, now that we have escaped from our "monogamist" past. The children no longer have to live with abuse and they are doing well in their studies. It is so amazing, they are happy and healthy now that they are far away from the brainwashing and abuse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)